mainline "exploding"

[Gerald Pfeifer]

On Sat, 18 Oct 2003, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> Hi, here are timmings of all sollutions I've proposed.
>
> 1 Current mainline                               0m57s
> 2 unit-at-a-time by default                      0m32s
> 3 Using different limits with old heuristics     0m27s
> 4 unit-at-a-time by default + small limits at O1 0m24s
> 5 New non-unit-at-a-time inlining heruistics     0m25s
>
> So all of them cuts the time to roughtly half of it.  My preference is
> either 5 or 2, but I would be happy with any of it (3 is IMO worst one).

To me, 5 or 4 look nice, both from the timings and abstractly.

I wouldn't take 2, considering it's 30% slower than 4 and 5.

Gerald