Compiler Analysis: 3.3, 3.4, or tree-ssa?

[Joe Buck]

Scott Robert Ladd <coyote@coyotegulch.com> writes:
> > Now that I'm ready to publish Acovea (Analysis of Compiler Options Via
> > Evolutionary Algorithm), I'm wondering which version of gcc I should
> > analyze.

On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 07:18:53PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> 3.4 is soon in feature freeze, so it's too late for major changes.

Right, but if Scott should discover that, say, a different combination of
-f options in -O2 would be significantly better, it seems that this would
be a low-risk change that still could be accepted.