CVS tags (was: [new-ra] merge with head)

[Gerald Pfeifer]

[ gcc-patches -> gcc ]

On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Michael Matz wrote:
> I just committed the result of merging HEAD at tag ra-merge-20031009 with
> this branch.

Is there any reason y'all need to add tags to mainline for such merges,
or could you simply use the -D2003-10-10 option of CVS as well?

I'm asking because there have been concerns about CVS being cluttered
with numerous tags, and indeed we currently have about 20 tags per month
(even though I hacked the snapshot script to avoid tags for snapshots
from mainline, thus saving 4 tags a month.)

Gerald
-- 
Gerald Pfeifer (Jerry)   gerald@pfeifer.com   http://www.pfeifer.com/gerald/