Speed issues taken seriously?

[Andreas Jaeger]

larsbj@gullik.net (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:

> Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl> writes:
>
> | Op vr 10-10-2003, om 16:49 schreef Lars Gullik Bjønnes:
>>> I just thought that I'd see how gcc 3.3.2 (CVS) and 3.4(CVS) compared,
>>> I was hoping (expecting) the recent months long threads on compile
>>> performance to have had an effect... the result was a bit
>>> disappointing...
>>
> | Did you compile with checking disabled?
>
> Probably not. I guess this will be turned off before 3.4. release?

Yes, it will be turned off for the release but we have it on for
development,

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj
  SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, 90429 Nürnberg, Germany
   GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/attachments/20031010/1bd1d2d1/attachment.sig>