On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 12:08:07PM -0700, Dale Johannesen wrote: > That is valid, but it looks like this code got munged since 3.3. All > those > "result=1"s used to be "return 1", so the control flow is now weird, for > example after 'X", I expect most of them should be "result=1; break" . Indeed. Patches solicited... ;-) r~