switch question in recog.c

Richard Henderson rth@redhat.com
Tue Oct 7 21:08:00 GMT 2003


On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 12:08:07PM -0700, Dale Johannesen wrote:
> That is valid, but it looks like this code got munged since 3.3.  All 
> those
> "result=1"s used to be "return 1", so the control flow is now weird, for
> example after 'X",   I expect most of them should be "result=1; break" .

Indeed.  Patches solicited... ;-)


r~



More information about the Gcc mailing list