RFA: Adding a location_t (or pointer) to tree_exp for 3.4 only.

Richard Henderson rth@redhat.com
Mon Oct 6 21:54:00 GMT 2003


On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 04:24:00PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> I'd be surprised if it was a major hit, too, but Carlo did claim he'd
> found more occurances than just the one I quoted.

One or two ocurrences does not make a good argument for
adding a location_t to tree_expr.  Dozens, maybe.



r~



More information about the Gcc mailing list