RFA: Adding a location_t (or pointer) to tree_exp for 3.4 only.

[Richard Henderson]

On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 09:08:17PM +0200, Carlo Wood wrote:
> Most code is simply assuming that if an expression is not
> a CALL_EXP it is not a call - while a CALL_EXP wrapped in
> a WFL *would* be a call.

That is a specious argument.  How does this differ from a
PLUS_EXPR that contains a call?


r~