RFA: Adding a location_t (or pointer) to tree_exp for 3.4 only.

[Hans-Peter Nilsson]

(It's properly "RFC" for this kind of message.  C is for Comments,
while A is for Approval, as in "patch-included-ok-to-check-in?".
Dan Berlin wants to make you say "[PATCH]" -- don't listen to him! ;-)

On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Carlo Wood wrote:
> I worked out several ways to achieve said goal of fixing the
> debug info of calls and inlining,
> (see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-09/msg00942.html)
> but in all cases there needs to be a location_t assigned to
> every CALL_EXPR.

Being on the receiving end of faulty inline debug info, I'd say
that fixing such problems would be quite worthwhile!

Unfortunately, I know too little of this area to even answer
your question.

To get a patch in in *this* phase, I suggest sending patches
ASAP.  (If you did, I guess I missed it.)  I suggest being very
careful to follow the contribution guidelines to avoid
unnecessary patch iterations and reviewer badwill.

brgds, H-P