Proposed targets to deprecate for 3.4

[Richard Henderson]

On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 03:11:00AM -0400, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> Hmm, maybe both uses could be replaced with unspec_volatile
> insns.  Can the scheduler still move insns past an unspec_volatile?

We never moved insns past unspec_volatile.

As for the rest of the register renaming thing, perhaps 
LEAF_REG_REMAP could be extended to indicate the results
of prologue_epilogue_contains or some other predicate.


r~