[tree-ssa] Producing lowered gimple directly?

Frank Ch. Eigler fche@redhat.com
Fri Nov 21 21:09:00 GMT 2003


dnovillo wrote:

> > Any opinions for or against it?
> We need high gimple for mudflap.

... or maybe not, with yesterday's changes.  Still it'd be great if
tree-ssa folks at least compare -fmudflap tests before/after such
a representation change, so we can get some earlier notification
of impending breakage.

- FChE



More information about the Gcc mailing list