reload vs adds with clobbers
DJ Delorie
dj@redhat.com
Sat May 31 03:57:00 GMT 2003
> Yes. In fact, I thought that was already done for xstormy16, but I
> probably missed a case...
I might have messed it up, too. I'm working on a newly reported bug,
and the fix for that broke the built-in-setjump test, leading me to
this point. FYI, the new bug is a case where the addhi3 is created
with the expander, but has the (scratch:HI) in it - after reload has
begun, so it doesn't match the pattern's constraints.
More information about the Gcc
mailing list