[tree-ssa] Switch stmts and inserting on edges

Jason Merrill jason@redhat.com
Fri May 30 21:23:00 GMT 2003


On Fri, 30 May 2003 13:25:57 -0600, law@redhat.com wrote:

> In message <wvlvfvs1bwb.fsf@prospero.boston.redhat.com>, Jason Merrill writes:
>  >On 30 May 2003 14:46:47 -0400, Diego Novillo <dnovillo@redhat.com> wrote:
>  >
>  >> On Fri, 2003-05-30 at 11:23, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
>  >>
>  >>> Any other suggestions? I havent thought of anything I actually like....
>  >>> 
>  >> The problem is that SWITCH_EXPRs still have implicit semantics that are
>  >> getting in the way.  I think this ought to be fixed by finishing Jason's
>  >> patch to expose SWITCH_EXPRs as explicit multi-way branches, or even
>  >> decision trees.
>  >
>  >Agreed.

> Similarly for the backedge in loops.

If we need to represent these explicitly, it leads me to wonder again why
we're retaining the control flow structures at all.

Andrew: With the current situation, you can move the target of a particular
switch case by moving the CASE_LABEL_EXPR into the new block.

Jason



More information about the Gcc mailing list