Bootstrap failure on Sparc Solaris2.8
Josh Loeb
sundog@mindspring.com
Wed May 28 19:22:00 GMT 2003
Here is the line from the pre-processed eh_alloc.ii file
static __gthread_mutex_t emergency_mutex ={{0,0,0,0,0}, {{{0}}}, 0};
It looks like __gthread_mutex_t is typedef'd from pthread_mutex_t, which on my system (in /usr/include/sys/types.h)
is defined as follows (note the first struct has four members, as compared to the five zeroes in the first initializer above):
typedef struct _pthread_mutex { /* = mutex_t in synch.h */
struct {
uint16_t __pthread_mutex_flag1;
uint8_t __pthread_mutex_flag2;
uint8_t __pthread_mutex_ceiling;
uint32_t __pthread_mutex_type;
} __pthread_mutex_flags;
union {
struct {
uint8_t __pthread_mutex_pad[8];
} __pthread_mutex_lock64;
upad64_t __pthread_mutex_owner64;
} __pthread_mutex_lock;
upad64_t __pthread_mutex_data;
} pthread_mutex_t;
I don't know enough about how everything hangs together to know for sure that's what being used, but it looks like a possible culprit. I'm wondering if I'm doing something wrong at config time or build time. Note as well, it appears that this is happening during the 64-bit compile of libstdc++.
--Josh
-------Original Message-------
From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>
Sent: 05/27/03 04:39 PM
To: Josh <sundog@mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: Re: Bootstrap failure on Sparc Solaris2.8
>
> > /* = DEFAULTMUTEX */
> #if __STDC__ - 0 == 0 && !defined(_NO_LONGLONG)
> #define PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER {{0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, {{{0}}}, 0}
> #else
> #define PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER {{0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, {{{0}}}, {0}}
> #endif
They look correct (I have the same lines on a Solaris 8 box that
bootstraps
without a hitch). Weird.
We need to see the preprocessed file build for eh_alloc.cc: could you
issue
the complete command line for compiling eh_alloc.cc (it is in your first
message) with an addtional --save-temps argument? It should give you a .i
file.
Then identify the new form of the line 81
static __gthread_mutex_t emergency_mutex =__GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT;
and try to identify the error.
--
Eric Botcazou
>
More information about the Gcc
mailing list