Bugzilla and gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org

[Andrew Pinski]

Think it should be the opposite as it was under GNAT.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski

On Friday, May 23, 2003, at 09:59 US/Eastern, Jason Thorpe wrote:

>
> On Friday, May 23, 2003, at 03:26  AM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>
>> I'd like to suggest that gcc-bugs be used only for NEW reports being
>> entered into bugzilla, and that some other list (maybe the currently
>> defunct gcc-prs) be used for all audit-trail mailings and follow-ups.
>
> I think this is a great idea.  It would certainly help me keep up with 
> it.
>
>         -- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com>
>
>
>