Bugzilla needs...
Daniel Berlin
dberlin@dberlin.org
Fri May 23 14:45:00 GMT 2003
On Friday, May 23, 2003, at 02:38 AM, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>> Should I rewrite bug_status to only just describe non bug-life cycle
>> things in a manner consistent with the descriptions in
>> bugs/management.html?
> I would put everything under "Maintainer's View of Fields" into
> bug_status, and just add a pointer from management.html to there. I'd
> add a pointer from bug_status saying "For policies and procedures, see
> management.html".
>
> This is just what *I'd* do, not necessarily what is best. :-)
>
>> PS I almost missed this message, with all the bug toggling you are
>> doing, i was about to delete all messages in my gcc box from neroden@
>> when i saw it.
>
> Sorry about that. After adding the keyword I saw the full list of
> sanity check errors and fixed all the ones I could fix by toggling.
>
> (I kept hitting them, before, oddly enough... guess those were just the
> bugs I was looking at.)
>
> As I emailed, there are other sanity check errors which I can't fix.
> (Which do cause red 'crash pages' when messing with the corresponding
> bugs.)
>
> Incidentally, there seems to be no easy way to put a report into the
> 'suspended' state.
I was waiting for someone to notice.
I'll commit the fix in a moment.
More information about the Gcc
mailing list