your RESOLVED->CLOSED changes

[John Anthony Kazos Jr.]

>I would also like to posit that quite a number of bugs will then stay
>RESOLVED indefinitely. If someone, say, fixes a bug on mn10200 or some
>other obscure target, who's going to double-check after a release and put
>in into CLOSED?

Doesn't that prove the lack of QA, and demonstrate the need for it? If a 
fix hasn't been checked, it *should* remain resolved-but-unclosed 
indefinately until someone checks it. Otherwise, why bother checking fixes 
at all?