Bugzilla and gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Richard Earnshaw
rearnsha@arm.com
Fri May 23 10:32:00 GMT 2003
I'd like to suggest that gcc-bugs be used only for NEW reports being
entered into bugzilla, and that some other list (maybe the currently
defunct gcc-prs) be used for all audit-trail mailings and follow-ups.
The problem we had in the past was that gcc-bugs and gcc-prs overlapped by
about 95%, which meant that both lists were practically useless. Keeping
gcc-bugs as a repository for new reports only would enable developers to
easily spot new bug reports coming in without having to wade through piles
of junk.
R.
More information about the Gcc
mailing list