PATCH: "make check" is broken in binutils
H. J. Lu
hjl@lucon.org
Tue May 20 16:29:00 GMT 2003
On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 08:53:40AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> This patch:
>
> 2003-05-19 Nathanael Nerode <neroden@gcc.gnu.org>
>
> * configure.in: Switch more things to use maybe dependencies.
> * Makefile.tpl: Switch more things to use maybe dependencies.
> Factor out common code from autogen IF statements.
> * configure: Regenerate.
> * Makefile.in: Regenerate.
>
> breaks "make check" in binutils. I got
>
> make[3]: *** No rule to make target `maybe-check-gcc', needed by `do-che
> ck'.
>
> Could you please fix it?
>
> Thanks.
I am testing this patch.
H.J.
-------------- next part --------------
2003-05-20 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
* Makefile.tpl (do-check): Change maybe-check-gcc to
@maybe_check_gcc@.
* Makefile.in: Regenerated.
* configure.in (maybe_check_gcc): New and substitute. Defined
as maybe-check-gcc for gcc.
* configure: Regenerated.
--- binutils/Makefile.tpl.check 2003-05-20 08:38:03.000000000 -0700
+++ binutils/Makefile.tpl 2003-05-20 09:11:47.000000000 -0700
@@ -743,7 +743,7 @@ check:
$(MAKE) do-check NOTPARALLEL=parallel-ok
# Only include modules actually being configured and built.
-do-check: maybe-check-gcc [+
+do-check: @maybe_check_gcc@ [+
FOR host_modules +] \
maybe-check-[+module+][+
ENDFOR host_modules +][+
--- binutils/configure.in.check 2003-05-20 08:38:03.000000000 -0700
+++ binutils/configure.in 2003-05-20 09:11:27.000000000 -0700
@@ -100,6 +100,9 @@ else
esac
fi
fi
+if test x${gcc_version_trigger} != x; then
+ maybe_check_gcc="maybe-check-gcc"
+fi
### To add a new directory to the tree, first choose whether it is a target
### or a host dependent tool. Then put it into the appropriate list
@@ -1974,6 +1977,7 @@ AC_SUBST(BUILD_PREFIX)
AC_SUBST(BUILD_PREFIX_1)
AC_SUBST(configlinks)
AC_SUBST(gcc_version_trigger)
+AC_SUBST(maybe_check_gcc)
AC_SUBST(gcc_version)
AC_SUBST(tooldir)
AC_SUBST(build_tooldir)
More information about the Gcc
mailing list