Warning for trigraphs in comment?
Gabriel Dos Reis
gdr@integrable-solutions.net
Mon May 19 06:51:00 GMT 2003
Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.co.uk> writes:
| Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:-
|
| > is extracted from Herb's GTW #86 -- full message appended below.
| > I would suggest we warn for trigraphs in comments.
|
| I changed this particular case a few weeks ago.
Thanks!
Since the discussion was about compilers released for production used,
I just content myself with checking 3.2.3 and 3.3 and found that the
comment and the behaviour were indeed there.
| In general I think warning about trigraphs in comments is a bad idea.
I see you stated a personal opinion but I think we need to weight that
against the fact that we got real world experience and the fact that
the comment is not accurate.
| This particular
| case I was of course always aware of, but considered it obscure.
| 3.4 documentation and behaviour is already good enough for you I
| think.
It is not particularly me. I was reporting input from discussions
which at first sight looked to me as just an academic exercise and it
turned out that it happened in reality.
| The patch is not appropriate for 3.3.
|
| The real fix is to remove trigraphs from the standard.
Oh, I'm all for removing trigraphs, digraphs, quadrigraphs and
whatevergraphs -- I've also thought they were mistakes. But, in fact,
I'm skeptical that would ever happen.
Anyway, I'm glad to hear that 3.4 will behave differently.
-- Gaby
More information about the Gcc
mailing list