Dead-code elimination can't remove string copy insns?

[Diego Novillo]

On Tue, 2003-05-13 at 13:16, law@redhat.com wrote:

> Err, we do zap GOTO_EXPRs to the next statement.  See
> remove_useless_stmts_and_vars.   It's restricted in that it can't deal
> with removal of a GOTO_EXPR when the label is at a different control
> nesting depth, but they're at the same nesting depth in your example.
> 
Then I found a bug :)  We didn't remove that goto in this case.

Maybe we apply the goto removal before the BIND_EXPR removal?  In this
case, we initially have the goto and the label at different nesting
levels.


Diego.