tree-ssa branch: Call for preliminary testing

[Diego Novillo]

On Mon, 2003-05-12 at 10:05, Daniel Berlin wrote:

> This abort is a known thing (it's because of an unfinished piece of 
> out-of-SSA), though I swear Diego was under the impression it shouldn't 
> happen with any of the current passes.
>
Yeah, it shouldn't be happening at this stage.  I've fixed a couple of
cases like this one where calls to const/pure built-ins weren't being
marked as such, resulting in the call disappearing unexpectedly when it
was constant folded.  I'll take a look.


Diego.