Suggestion for a new GNATS policy
Giovanni Bajo
giovannibajo@libero.it
Mon May 12 02:03:00 GMT 2003
Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org> wrote:
>> Because a new addition to the audit-trail doesn't mean that the
>> PR was really rechecked. Modified doesn't imply reconfirmed.
>>
> Hence the need for a boolean flag.
> I can have it auto-reset them every 30 days a bug isn't touched or
> something, if you like, as a cronjob.
> There's still no need for a full timestamp, because it knows when the
> flag was changed anyway.
It's not a boolean flag. Either a bug has been confirmed 2 day ago, 2 weeks
ago, 2 months ago or 2 years go, they're all different situations. Since
GNATS doesn't have a field for this, we're putting it into the synopsis. I
would not mind Bugzilla to have such a timestamp.
Giovanni Bajo
More information about the Gcc
mailing list