tree-ssa branch: Fortran libraries don't build

[Gabriel Dos Reis]

"Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk> writes:

| On Thu, 8 May 2003, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
| 
| > Try this instead:
| > 
| > -          | egrep 'gcc-[0-9]+_[0-9]+-branch$' \
| > +          | egrep '(gcc|tree-ssa)-[0-9_]+-branch$' \
| 
| If extra active branches are to get automatic date dumps, I'd rather
| having an explicit list of branches that get added rather than
| complicating the egrep.  Or, better, move to an explicit list of active
| branches to bump (as recently discussed in the context of not keeping
| bumping dates on closed branches),

I don't recall if it were you or not but someone pointed out that it
was a feature that active branches got automatic date bump without
explicitly giving a list of such branches, hence the "grep -v".  
Now, you're contemplating the other way.  I'm confused.

|  but then creating a script to do some
| of the work of making a new release branch would be better than adding yet
| another step to the branching process.

I'm for anything that can simplify life.

-- Gaby