GCC target-specific extension
Richard Henderson
rth@redhat.com
Wed May 7 01:16:00 GMT 2003
On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 01:33:44AM +0200, Fabio Alemagna wrote:
> Inline functions aren't good because they need a global libbase (unless
> you passed one to it as parameter, which again I want to avoid),
Oh, I thought a parameter was where you were getting your
libbase in the first place.
> Last but not least: would it be welcome a frontend feature which let
> target-specific code "transform" declarations/definitions on the basis of
> given attributes?
No. We have enough problems with moderately well-defined
extensions. Arbitrary transformations are right out.
r~
More information about the Gcc
mailing list