Backporting pch support to 3.2?

[Stan Shebs]

Benjamin Kosnik wrote:

>This has not been done, to my knowledge. As gcc-3_2-branch is dead,
>you'll have more encouragement porting it to gcc-3_3-branch.
>
>And I'm not quite sure that is feasible, although I'd sure like to see
>it. Geoff Keating would be the person who might be able to provide you
>with a more definite answer.
>
A less authoritative reaction: "Just thinking about it makes my head
hurt.  I think I'll go lie down now." :-)

But seriously, there was a lot of data structure tinkering involved,
and it would be a heinous job and find all the bits and get them
working.  Converting the client project to 3.3 would be easier;
even arguing with reluctant mgmt nonstop for three weeks would
*still* be easier!

Stan