Joy with new GCC 3.3 warnings -- HTF to shut them up?

[Segher Boessenkool]

Joe Buck wrote:
> I think it was a mistake for gcc to make this change, in fact, one can
> argue that it is a regression (in that there doesn't appear to be a
> way to write a conforming C program that uses this standard means of

Standard?  What standard?  I think you mean "using this
old-fashioned, non-portable means" instead.

> getting a version identifier into the object file without producing a
> warning).


Segher