RFA: Please review the new C++ demangler patch

Phil Edwards phil@jaj.com
Fri Jun 27 22:56:00 GMT 2003


On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 11:36:35PM +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> |  :-)  Why fold
> | a completely unused library into the executable?
> 
> static link against libstdc++-v3, does not mean the whole libstdc++-v3
> (especially the unused bits) is pulled into the executable.  Does it?
> The contention seems to be the dependence on <string> and <vector>.

Depends on how smart the linker is, and how fine-grained the library's
object files are.

Anyhow, this is getting off-topic.

-- 
If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater
than the animating contest for freedom, go home and leave us in peace.  We seek
not your counsel, nor your arms.  Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you;
and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.            - Samuel Adams



More information about the Gcc mailing list