RFA: Please review the new C++ demangler patch

[Gabriel Dos Reis]

Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com> writes:

| >2. libdemangle has few use for libstdc++. It is not a big deal,
| >but maybe confusing to users.
| 
| Right. I was just using this to explain the idea. In reality, there
| needs to be a __cxa_demangle in libsupc++, irregardless: libdemangle
| should just link it from there and be done. Still, it's easier to
| express the dependency info this way.

I do not believe there is any need to have libdemangle separate from
libstdc++. I do not believe taking the demangler out of libstdc++
would really solve the core issues.

-- Gaby