C++ demangler horrors

[H. J. Lu]

On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 03:34:33PM -0400, Phil Edwards wrote:
> 
> If someone volunteers to do #3, the problem is solved.  If not, then maybe
> something like
> 
>     a)  bootstrap as normal
>     b)  build target libiberty with no demangling support
>     if c++ is an enabled language,
>         c) build libstdc++
>         d) build the demangler
>         e) fold the demangler objects into libiberty and libsupc++
>     end if
> 

Isn't that exactly what my patch does? The only differences are

         c) build libstdc++ with demangler in libsupc++
         d) build the demangler
         e) fold the demangler objects into libiberty


H.J.


H.J.