RFA: Please review the new C++ demangler patch

[Kaveh R. Ghazi]

 > From: Joe Buck <jbuck@synopsys.com>
 > 
 > On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 02:57:33PM -0400, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
 > >  > if you have a modern C++ compiler it already has <vector> and
 > >  > <string>.
 > > 
 > > Not if you just built cc1plus in stage1, see:
 > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-06/msg02221.html
 > > 
 > > Can we (re)write quick mini-string and mini-vector classes to get past
 > > this?
 > 
 > We could.  But should we?  Why not just build libstdc++ before the
 > demangler?

It removes the need for having/building libstdc++ altogether.

I don't know how useful that is, if you don't have source for
libstdc++ then you probably don't have the source for cc1plus either.
So you need your own "modern" c++ compiler anyway.

Just a suggestion.

--
Kaveh R. Ghazi			ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu