RFA: Please review the new C++ demangler patch

Bill Cunningham billc44@citynet.net
Thu Jun 26 14:49:00 GMT 2003


----- Original Message -----
From: "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
To: "Alexandre Oliva" <aoliva@redhat.com>
Cc: "Zack Weinberg" <zack@codesourcery.com>; "Benjamin Kosnik"
<bkoz@redhat.com>; <dj@redhat.com>; <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 1:13 AM
Subject: Re: RFA: Please review the new C++ demangler patch


> On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 12:44:02AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> > On Jun 25, 2003, "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> wrote:
> >
> > > I don't want to force the change of the build order between libiberty
> > > and libstdc++ in this patch. It may cause other problems.
> >
> > I think it will cause problems for Cygwin.
>
> That is what I am afraid of.
>
> >
> > I strongly dislike the idea of replacing object files in a library
> > created in a different directory.  It will make parallel builds even
> > messier than they are.  Let's please try to find another way to do it.
> >
>
> Do you have any suggestions? The main problem is demangler, which
> is the part of libibert, depends on libstdc++ and libstdc++ depends
> on libiberty. But demangler only needs the header files from libstdc++.
> Is there a way out?
>
>
> H.J.

Gosh you guys are good.

    Bill C




More information about the Gcc mailing list