C++ defect reports: how to behave

[Nathan Sidwell]

Giovanni Bajo wrote:
> Joe Buck <jbuck@synopsys.com> wrote:

>>It's not clear whether that's quite right.  Clearly if an issue with WP
>>status conflicts with current use, it can't be enabled by default.
WP is different to DR

> Yes, I guess this is why, for instance, the implementation of DR295 is
> disabled.
Sometimes I wish I'd never suggested that one :) I need to get off my lazy
ass and clarify some things about type deduction with the EDG guys.

IMO, we should implement the DR's without needing a separate switch
for them. C++0x is a different beast and will need a switch. Mark and
Jason expressed the same view at the summit.


nathan

-- 
Nathan Sidwell    ::   http://www.codesourcery.com   ::     CodeSourcery LLC
          The voices in my head said this was stupid too
nathan@codesourcery.com    ::     http://www.planetfall.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk