C++ defect reports: how to behave

[Phil Edwards]

On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 11:06:25PM +0200, Giovanni Bajo wrote:
> Phil Edwards <phil@jaj.com> wrote:
> 
> > (BTW, are you sure you mean 295?  I can't find such commented code.)
> 
> It's not eactly commented. It's just worked around. cp/tree.c,
> cp_build_qualified_type_real.

Ah, core defect.  I was looking at library defect.


> Instead, TC1 defects are really just "bugs" of the
> standard, so I don't think we should care about keeping them separate from
> C++98.

I'd agree with that.

> As for the new macro, we might as well bump __cplusplus (since that's its
> meaning). Comments?

__cplusplus is still set to 1.  Setting it to the correct value utterly
hoses Solaris.


-- 
If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater
than the animating contest for freedom, go home and leave us in peace.  We seek
not your counsel, nor your arms.  Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you;
and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.            - Samuel Adams