Problem with new option handling?

[Neil Booth]

Geert Bosch wrote:-

> >To be sure, could you just apply the 4-or-5 line hunk in opts.c that
> >applies to find_opt()?  If you apply the extra switches too, it might
> >simply be hidden but still present.
> 
> I already had that patch applied, so maybe it caused the problem.
> I'll try reverting it in my local tree.

I've just realized it's still not quite right.  If the problem
persists, we can cure it short-term by moving -g handling
back into toplev.c.  find_opt() needs to be a bit smarter.

Neil.