Does "complex xxx" work?

[Gabriel Dos Reis]

"H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> writes:

| On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 07:29:38PM +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| > "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> writes:
| > 
| > | c_common_nodes_and_builtins calls
| > | 
| > |   (*lang_hooks.decls.pushdecl) (build_decl (TYPE_DECL,
| > |                                             get_identifier ("complex int"),
| > |                                             complex_integer_type_node));
| > |   (*lang_hooks.decls.pushdecl) (build_decl (TYPE_DECL,
| > |                                             get_identifier ("complex float"),
| > |                                             complex_float_type_node));
| > |   (*lang_hooks.decls.pushdecl) (build_decl (TYPE_DECL,
| > |                                             get_identifier ("complex double"),
| > |                                             complex_double_type_node));
| > |   (*lang_hooks.decls.pushdecl)
| > |     (build_decl (TYPE_DECL, get_identifier ("complex long double"),
| > |                  complex_long_double_type_node));
| > | 
| > | What are they used for? I still can't use any of those in C++.
| > 
| > "_Complex type" works in C++.  Note that complex, in C99, behaves as if
| > 
| >   #define complex _Complex
| > 
| 
| I know "_Complex type" works. My question is "complex type". 

OK.

| Those
| calls are not needed for "_Complex type". What are they doing there?

They should be removed, because in C99  complex is supposed to be a
macro. 

-- Gaby