Question on TREE_CODE_CLASS of 's'

[Zack Weinberg]

kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner) writes:

>     So?  What's the point in inventing some common tree thingys for
>     mainline when clearly the Correct Common Tree Thingys are being
>     done elsewhere?  You'd only be duplicating work.
>
> I'm not talking about "inventing", just changing things to be more
> consistent.  The mainline is going to be around for a while yet.

If you can get rid of all the #ifdefs in tree-inline.c by changing
some tree code classes around, and you can do it in the 3.4 timeframe,
I for one am all for that.

zw