Proposed targets to deprecate (sigh)

[tm_gccmail@mail.kloo.net]

On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Jim Wilson wrote:

> Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > These CPU targets have no maintainer:
> 
> In the past, we didn't have a policy of requiring a maintainer, so lack 
> of a maintainer does not necessarily mean that a port is unused or 
> unmaintained.  Most of the ports you listed are getting some use and 
> some maintenance, just not a lot.  I think the only ones you won't get 
> an argument for are d30v and frv. 

There appears to be no comprehensive documentation on the d30v instruction
set, therefore I rescind my offer to become maintainer of the d30v.

Toshi