3.3 error when inlining

[Jim Wilson]

Michael S. Zick wrote:
> I think the following confirms that the problem is more extensive...
> Use release-3.3, on x86 (for i686)...
> Use the below modification of the test case...
> Compile without any gcc options, other than: -S -g ...
> Inspect output.s ...
> Bingo - silent generation of unexpected (wrong?) code.

I just tried this, and I don't see anything wrong with the output. 
Perhaps you are assuming that there is no optimization if you don't 
specify -O?  This is incorrect.  Look at the RTL dumps.  Some of the 
branches are generated and then optimized away, even though -O was not 
specified.  The labels are not optimized away, but that is harmless, 
after all we aren't trying to optimize here.  This is a change from 2.95 
which didn't do any optimization at all when -O wasn't specified.

Jim