i386-G++ ICE in output_operand with static and -fPIC
Michael Eager
eager@mvista.com
Fri Jun 13 22:18:00 GMT 2003
I compile the attached test case with G++ 3.2.2 specifying -fPIC:
g++ -fPIC x.cpp -o x
the following error is generated:
x.cpp: In function `int ListNextX()':
x.cpp:19: output_operand: Wrong address expression or operand constraint
The error appears to occur when code for the structure assignment
on line 16 is being generated. The messages is actually generated by
print_operand_address() in i386.c. The rtx node that it fails on is
(plus:SI (mem:SI (plus:SI (reg/f:SI 6 ebp)
(const_int -1344 [0xfffffac0])) [0 S4 A8])
(const:SI (unspec:SI[
(symbol_ref/v:SI ("AppList"))
] 7)))
If I remove the "static" storage attribute from AppList, the error
disappears. The corresponding rtx node is a bit different:
(mem/u:SI (plus:SI (reg:SI 3 ebx)
(const:SI (unspec:SI[
(symbol_ref:SI ("AppList"))
] 6))) [0 S4 A8])
If I read the code correctly, by the time output_operand is called,
the expectation is that the rtx can be assembled with one instruction.
The failing node can't be output as a single x86 instruction, it looks
like it should be converted into two (or more) instructions.
Can someone help me out here? Where should I be looking?
Please CC me at this email address.
Test case (x.cpp):
typedef struct {
int Id;
char Errors[128][10];
} ListElem_T;
//static
ListElem_T AppList[100];
int
ListNextX()
{
unsigned int i;
ListElem_T x;
x = AppList[i]; /* Structure Assignment */
return -1;
}
--
Michael Eager eager@mvista.com 408-328-8426
MontaVista Software, Inc. 1237 E. Arques Ave., Sunnyvale, CA 94085
More information about the Gcc
mailing list