GCC 3.3.1 and GCC 3.4 Schedule

Andrew Pinski pinskia@physics.uc.edu
Thu Jun 12 01:05:00 GMT 2003


On Wednesday, Jun 11, 2003, at 19:44 US/Eastern, Daniel Berlin wrote:

>
> On Wednesday, June 11, 2003, at 06:08  PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
>>
>> On Wednesday, Jun 11, 2003, at 17:58 US/Eastern, Wolfgang Bangerth 
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I personally think that both numbers do not justify the term 
>>> "relatively few".
>>> Fortunately, most regressions are against both 3.3 and mainline, so 
>>> a fix
>>> would be doubly useful.
>>
>> I had gone through one day and set the target milestones which was 
>> not set and had
>> 3.3 regression, I changed the milestone to 3.3.1. I will go through 
>> the ones that
>> start with "[3.3" and set the milestone 3.3.1, that will make the 
>> number target for
>> 3.3.1 go higher.
>
> I can do this in about 3 seconds with a perl script i have that does 
> this type of thing using sql commands.
> Let me know if you haven't done it already, and i'll do it.
>

I have it already done because most of them I had already done there 
was like 20 left,
I also pushed some back because of the comments.


Thanks,
Andrew Pinski



More information about the Gcc mailing list