treelang fix for rs6000 / treelang not proper front end
Gerald Pfeifer
pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at
Tue Jun 10 10:49:00 GMT 2003
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Andrew Haley wrote:
> Yes. My current plan is to convert the gcj byte compiler as part of
> converting java to tree-ssa. If that's going to be too late in the
> release cycle I guess my plan needs to change.
Which release?
Last time I tested, tree-ssa slowed down our already slow compiler quite
a bit, so I cannot imagine tree-ssa being part of a release in the near
future, as much as I like that approach and project. :-(
(See PR8361 for an example.)
Gerald
More information about the Gcc
mailing list