[tree-ssa] tree-ssa vs. fold

Richard Henderson rth@redhat.com
Sat Jun 7 22:34:00 GMT 2003


On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 06:18:17PM -0400, Jeff Sturm wrote:
> d) Fix fold() not to save_expr.
> 
> Is d) the only real choice?  Am I missing something easy?

While (d) is certainly desirable, there is an even more
short-term solution that would probably benefit mainline
as well: a SAVE_EXPR shouldn't have been created for a
simple non-volatile DECL.

This can be trivially fixed inside save_expr itself.


r~



More information about the Gcc mailing list