[tree-ssa] tree-ssa vs. fold
Richard Henderson
rth@redhat.com
Sat Jun 7 22:34:00 GMT 2003
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 06:18:17PM -0400, Jeff Sturm wrote:
> d) Fix fold() not to save_expr.
>
> Is d) the only real choice? Am I missing something easy?
While (d) is certainly desirable, there is an even more
short-term solution that would probably benefit mainline
as well: a SAVE_EXPR shouldn't have been created for a
simple non-volatile DECL.
This can be trivially fixed inside save_expr itself.
r~
More information about the Gcc
mailing list