[tree-ssa] RFC: Never gimplify ASM_EXPRs

[Geert Bosch]

On Thursday, Jun 5, 2003, at 20:51 America/New_York, Richard Henderson 
wrote:

> I wonder if GIMPLE needs better annotations on parameters?
> In particular, I recall that Ada can explicitly set in, out
> or inout in the source code.

That is true, but the implementation has some freedom to pass
things either by value (ie. copy in, copy out) or by reference.
Only for scalars is pass-by-value required. In practice, GNAT
tries to follow the C ABI where equivalent C types exist.

   -Geert