Severities and priorities in bugzilla
Wolfgang Bangerth
bangerth@ices.utexas.edu
Tue Jun 3 15:56:00 GMT 2003
> > Severities
> > Critical A regression or other important broken functionality
> > Normal Any bug where gcc generates wrong code or doesn't conform
> > to some relevant standard, or where diagnostics are
> > misleading
>
> I don't see why you would put wrong-code in this category. IMHO,
> wrong-code are really the worst kind of bugs and should nearly always
> be Critical.
Fair enough. Fortunately, wrong-code PRs usually are also regressions, so
they'd go into the first bucket anyway. How many wrong-code PRs are not
regression?
> How about kicking Priorities completely?
I think there was sentiment against that in an earlier discussion. I
wouldn't object, for sure. I think we've got too many knobs to turn and
push right now.
W.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wolfgang Bangerth email: bangerth@ices.utexas.edu
www: http://www.ices.utexas.edu/~bangerth/
More information about the Gcc
mailing list