Documenting tools necessary for GCC [draft]

[Zack Weinberg]

Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> writes:

> On Jun  2, 2003, Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>
>> This is pure speculation, but I'm pretty sure most of mklibgcc would
>> become unnecessary if we could use GNU make's pattern rules.
>
> It wouldn't be too hard to convince me of this, but ideally libgcc
> should be moved into a separate top-level directory and handled by the
> generic multilib machinery, which would obviate such pattern rules.

Yeah, I'd like to see that done, too.

zw