g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C

[Per Bothner]

Mark Mitchell wrote:

> Since your patch caused this regression,

That is rather arguable - my patch incorrectly *hid* a bug in 
pushdecl_class_level.  A rather unusual case, admittedly.

> would you please prepare and
> test a patch to fix the problem?

Well, here's an attached patch.  It's hard for me to interpret the 'make 
check' output because of the many failures.  I noticed this regression 
from a last time I ran the testsuite:

FAIL: g++.dg/ext/packed2.C (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/home/bothner/GNU/gcc.head/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/packed2.C:18: 
warning: ignoring packed attribute on unpacked non-POD field `A B::a'

I'm assuming this is an unrelated regression.
-- 
	--Per Bothner
per@bothner.com   pbothner@apple.com  http://per.bothner.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: decl.patch
URL: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/attachments/20030724/b2c11cf3/attachment.ksh>