Label handling overhaul (C front end only)

[Kai Henningsen]

gdr@integrable-solutions.net (Gabriel Dos Reis)  wrote on 20.07.03 in <m3vfty3tg8.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net>:

> "Zack Weinberg" <zack@codesourcery.com> writes:

> | has.  If you don't like the way I made it work, you can submit a patch
> | to change it and argue over the semantics with people who do care.

> Everybody wants better internal structure and I don't doubt you need
> that.  But the way you're conducting this issue calls for mess :-(

Frankly, how anyone can propose the semantics you did propose, contrast  
those with Zack's, and call *Zack's* version "a mess", is beyond me.

Your proposed semantics are one of the worst-defined and most illogical I  
ever heard, whereas Zack's version seems entirely obvious (and in fact a  
clear improvement on what the language standard gives).

MfG Kai