PR 10510 (was Re: PR 10501)

[Andrew Pinski]

This is referring to PR 10510, not PR 10501 (as the subject said) to 
just be clear.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski

On Friday, Jul 11, 2003, at 19:08 US/Eastern, Mark Mitchell wrote:

>
> Jan --
>
> This PR is apparently your bug.  Note also the last comment in the PR:
>
> ------- Additional Comment #5 From Richard Henderson 2003-06-13 01:03 
> -------
>
> The patch David cites does appear to be the culprit.
>
> Jan, something screwy is going on.  ChangeLogs indicate that the patch
> is present on mainline, but visual inspection of the relevant files
> reveals that it isn't.
>
> ----------------------------------
>
> Can you illuminate the situation?
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Mark Mitchell
> CodeSourcery, LLC
> mark@codesourcery.com
>
>