RFA: __imag__ and __real__ in C++ (bug 11437)
Mark Mitchell
mark@codesourcery.com
Fri Jul 11 21:40:00 GMT 2003
On Wed, 2003-07-09 at 15:03, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> This is just a proof of concept. In particular, the mangling chosen
> was arbitrary and probably wrong. :-)
>
> But I'd like a C++ person to look at bug 11437, and at my analysis and
> see what should be done. An alternative solution is to remove _Complex
> support from C++, of course.
Your patch is OK -- except that you can't count. :-) Or, rather, you
didn't know you were supposed to count. :-) The mangling should be
"v18__imag__" since there is 1 argument and 8 characters in "__imag__".
Similarly for "__real__".
Please make that change and check it in!
--
Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
CodeSourcery, LLC
More information about the Gcc
mailing list