bootstrap failure: libstdc++-v3/include/stdc++.h:83
Andrew Pinski
pinskia@physics.uc.edu
Thu Jul 10 12:43:00 GMT 2003
On Thursday, Jul 10, 2003, at 06:42 US/Eastern, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> My nightly GCC builder succeeded, kind of surprisingly, because I
> noticed
> no patch on gcc-patches announcing a fix.
That is because it was discussed in the regression mail list:
<http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2003-07/msg00206.html>.
> However, gcc/cp/ChangeLog has the following entry
>
> 2003-07-09 Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
>
> * typeck.c (build_x_unary_op): Take note of the fact that
> PREINCREMENT_EXPR and POSTINCREMENT_EXPR are binary operations
> on
> trees.
>
> * parser.c (cp_parser_primary_expression): Preserve the form of
> qualified expressions in templates, even if they are not
> dependent.
> * pt.c (convert_nontype_argument): Handle non-dependent
> SCOPE_REFs.
> (tsubst_qualified_id): Likewise.
> * search.c (accessible_p): Treat everything in the body of a
> template as accessible.
>
> whereas http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-07/msg00993.html does
> not
> mention the first hunk (to typeck.c). Is this the fix for the
> bootstrap
> failure?
Yes.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2003-07/msg00206.html> for
the patch.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
More information about the Gcc
mailing list